Skip to content
Canajun Finances Home » Canadians were Earning More in 2007

Canadians were Earning More in 2007

“The average weekly earnings of payroll employees (seasonally adjusted) increased $1.06 (+0.1%) from a month earlier to $764.12 in February.”, pronounced Stats Canada, and that is a good thing. Given that employment is also increasing in Canada as well, that is a good thing!

The number they quote is a little weird $764 a month is only about $9,000 per year, but I think it is a composite of ALL incomes, so it includes part time and high school students and such. Have a look at this table it is fascinating to read (and reprinted without permission, so check out the Stats Canada version as well):

Average weekly earnings (including overtime) for all employees
Industry group (North American Industry Classification System) February 2006 January 2007 February 2007 January to February 2007 February 2006 to February 2007 Year-to-date average 2007
  Seasonally adjusted
  $ % change
Industrial aggregate 740.18 763.06 764.12 0.1 3.2 3.1
Forestry, logging and support 959.52 979.32 989.48 1.0 3.1 2.8
Mining and oil and gas 1,335.90 1,393.04 1,391.25 -0.1 4.1 4.4
Utilities 1,081.69 1,100.87 1,103.97 0.3 2.1 2.2
Construction 898.07 907.34 915.17 0.9 1.9 1.6
Manufacturing 898.52 926.29 923.17 -0.3 2.7 2.8
Wholesale trade 862.76 898.54 907.21 1.0 5.2 4.8
Retail trade 484.30 485.67 490.96 1.1 1.4 0.8
Transportation and warehousing 785.75 795.32 798.40 0.4 1.6 1.5
Information and cultural industries 922.40 957.50 955.35 -0.2 3.6 3.8
Finance and insurance 939.81 979.76 989.95 1.0 5.3 4.5
Real estate and rental and leasing 664.63 702.50 704.60 0.3 6.0 5.8
Professional, scientific and technical services 949.91 976.26 975.32 -0.1 2.7 2.4
Management of companies and enterprises 968.92 915.36 929.31 1.5 -4.1 -4.2
Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services 586.38 645.60 641.63 -0.6 9.4 9.6
Educational services 816.98 821.46 815.54 -0.7 -0.2 0.4
Health care and social assistance 672.95 695.29 694.58 -0.1 3.2 3.1
Arts, entertainment and recreation 429.46 440.95 441.21 0.1 2.7 1.8
Accommodation and food services 292.00 325.55 319.69 -1.8 9.5 10.9
Other services (excluding public administration) 568.73 598.23 596.57 -0.3 4.9 5.3
Public administration 916.35 949.24 957.31 0.9 4.5 4.1
Provinces and territories            
Newfoundland and Labrador 683.04 702.86 704.23 0.2 3.1 3.0
Prince Edward Island 599.78 625.02 632.08 1.1 5.4 4.8
Nova Scotia 652.15 666.77 669.56 0.4 2.7 2.4
New Brunswick 678.46 696.84 702.26 0.8 3.5 3.3
Quebec 692.66 707.63 716.07 1.2 3.4 3.1
Ontario 778.35 798.01 798.69 0.1 2.6 2.5
Manitoba 669.43 686.10 696.29 1.5 4.0 3.4
Saskatchewan 683.79 710.55 714.78 0.6 4.5 3.8
Alberta 789.17 827.45 829.53 0.3 5.1 5.2
British Columbia 735.61 752.65 750.41 -0.3 2.0 2.2
Yukon 848.16 856.85 862.48 0.7 1.7 1.2
Northwest Territories 984.19 970.46 981.29 1.1 -0.3 0.1
Nunavut 877.55 924.92 937.97 1.4 6.9 5.3
r revised
p preliminary
1. Rate of change for the first month of 2007 compared to the same month for 2006.
2. Data not seasonally adjusted.

From 2007, but still an interesting historical perspective.

Feel Free to Comment

  1. Just shows one of the things I learned in school: One can’t properly proofread one’s own work! I guess StatsCan reported weekly earnings, as folks are paid on different periods, and a weekly report is the best denominator. Some of the numbers are interesting: the “Starving Artist” is represented; the petroleum industry wages are a bit higher than I would have expected; the hospitality industry a bit lower. I was surprised at the ‘utility’ category.
    David

  2. C8J Mis-stated: “The number they quote is a little weird $764 a month is only about $9,000 per year,”

    Stats Canada is discussing WEEKLY income, so $764 weekly = $39,728. Still not enough to buy a house in Ottawa, Toronto, Saskatoon, much of Alberta, or southern BC, and many other places with escalating prices.

    This should translate to an average family income in the $76,000 range, as all families do not have two incomes.

    David

  3. Thanks, I knew something was wrong, I have left the dumb ass comment in, but have struck it through, so folks understand your comment (and my stupidity).

    I’ll just go back to the “dumb dumb” shed now… -c8j

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Verified by MonsterInsights